Archive for March, 2006

The Stagemaster Project

Friday, March 31st, 2006

In the next few weeks (or months), I plan to hot rod a somewhat mediocre electric guitar and chronicle the entire journey in a blog. This will be a detailed step-by-step account of the modifications made to the guitar complete with photographs of the steps involved. It is my intention to turn this lackluster sounding guitar into something special. The “Stagemaster Project” blog will have a finite beginning and end, the beginning being now and the end when the project is complete.

The steps involved in the project are bound to change as I haven’t settled certain issues floating around in my head yet. For example, I haven’t yet decided if I want preserve the original 1 volume control and 1 tone control configuration or upgrade to a Strat style 1 volume control and 2 tone control set up. This will be the type of decisions I will make as I go along.

Why a Fender Squire Stagemaster? Because I happen to have one and I happen to love the way it plays. Several of my friends have played this guitar as well and have also remarked that it is very nice guitar to play. The fretboard, neck and action are wonderful to experience, but to be completely honest, the sound leaves a lot to be desired due to the inferior pickups and overall junky electronics. The noise, screeching and ear-piercing feedback this guitar produces at higher volume is really hard to describe. At lower levels, however, some really nice sounds can be achieved. But again, this guitar is a joy to play and I see a lot of potential for improvement in the sound, and the appearance.

Among other things, I plan to replace all of the factory pickups with DiMarzios, replace the junky volume and tone pots and capacitor, replace the 5-way pickup selector switch, replace all of the wiring and shield everything properly, replace all of the knobs and have a custom pickguard made. The project will not involve a new paintjob or any work to the neck, body or bridge. These are be best qualities of the guitar that I intend to preserve.

In my continuing blog entries, I will post photos of the project guitar and some of the history behind it, i.e, how I came to own it, etc. I will also post some general personal observations regarding the guitar.

I hope you will visit “The Stagemaster Project” periodically to see how the project is going.

Tom Goodson is an accomplished guitarist and lifelong guitar enthusiast. Please visit his “The Stagemaster Project” blog at: stagemaster.blogspot.com/ stagemaster.blogspot.com/

A Fact Behind Ph.D Degree

Friday, March 31st, 2006

“High education”, a jargon that may distinguish us spiritually and materially, from a huge numbers of people, whom are thought to be living in the very spiritually primitive parts of the world.

Everyday, we see that the ideas from those with Ph.D degrees seem to carry profound influence on the world’s phenomenon. So why are their words carry more power? No one states that what thoughts from those with Ph.D degree are right, but it is us, the people with no distinguished level on the social stages, who think that. Philosophers have thought that “the idea from an innocent boy would somehow thought as “genuinely good” than those with Ph.D dgrees.

However, unconditionally, I do appreciate those with such the qualifications, since it is the landmark of their protracted endeavors. So do you really want to earn a Ph.D degree? If yes, so that is Ph.D? The sole and honest scope of this article is to reveal one truth behind Ph.D degree to the world in general.

Our diverse world is constituted of too many tissues that make us hard to walk from which from which. Those from Ph.D degrees are trained to see, as I assume, more evil existences in this world.

The world is full of opportunity and more apparently, “the evils.” If a person is categorized into “doctoral species”, he or she was trained to see huge negative aspects of the world that need to be demolished or rectified: the way to make our world a better place. What I am talking about here is already spoken too many times already from different people from different social aspects, but it is here just “to reiterate the truth.”

Ph.D degree just means “to make the world a better place.” Think about this phrase to make it truly melt into your heart, before you decide to enroll into the degree. Ph.D, from its natural sense, is not mean to make huge profit like many have thought. Aggregating the genuine information, regardless of how good or bad, discriminate or neutral, silly or intellectual, and revel it to the world.

However, most Ph.D graduates have turned the natural meanings up-side-down. The next spiritual module for you the readers, is to think about those with Ph.D that turn the down its natural meaning.

Lay Vicheka is a translator for the most celebrated translation agency in the Kingdom of Cambodia, Pyramid. He is working as freelance writer for Search Newspaper, focusing on social issues and students’ issues. Lay Vicheka has great experience in law and politics, as he used to be legal and English-language assistant to a member of parliament, migration experience (home-based business) and experience in writing. You are stronly advised to contact him for any doubts or wonder about Cambodian politics and even the world’s phenomenon.

Posting address: 221H Street 93, Tuol Sangke quarter, Russey Keo district, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Tel: 855 11 268 445, mailto:vichekalay@yahoo.com vichekalay@yahoo.com

The Ring - A Synopsis

Friday, March 31st, 2006

The movie utilized camera, editing, and special effects to conjure fear & suspense into the minds of viewers. Most scenes were pictured in a dark environment typical of horror movies. The story was about a strange video that resulted in death to the viewers after 7 days.

The movie began when a young female journalist was asked to investigate the mysterious death of her friend’s teenage daughter after watching the strange video.

One of the scenes in the movie was particularly scary for me. The closet scene had an abrupt close–up on the victim’s face that in my opinion successfully intensified the idea to emphasize the victim’s shocking experience before her death.

The same method were used for the other victims using similar “slow camera movement & final shock” technique amidst the eerie background music for example during the final scenes of the movie when she slowly approached the chair and turned the chair around to see the “pruned” corpse of her ex-husband.

The investigation led to the discovery of other similar deaths. The young female journalist watched the video and then began her own life threatening 7 day countdown.

Her ex-husband and their son eventually watched the same video and both of them together became even more determined to find the answers in order to survive the curse.

Coincidently, her ex-husband was some sort of professional video expert. There was a scene where the female journalist utilized a very large video VHS machine that could zoom, copy, and edit a VHS format video at her ex-husband’s office searching the video for clues. More mysterious events occurred as she progressed to her final cursed days and reached the locations of the scenes she found in the strange video.

The most frightening and interesting part of the movie was when the ghost stepped out of the video space from inside the television and into the office space because it raised the question of how a television was treated in Architectural space. An “undead” being had just stepped out from the television. Meaning the television had to be considered similar to a main entrance door in function. No longer is the television for example only an entertainment unit as a focal point in a living room.

An appropriate architectural idea was inherent in the scene to frighten people in an architectural space. The television was situated as the focal point directly opposite of the main entrance door to the office. The positioning of the television proposed itself as a mirror image to the main door, a gateway to an alternate reality. In my opinion the above idea went very well with the scene as the architectural element elevated the entire scene on to another entertainingly intellectual level.

Such an architectural idea was applied in the scene. The scene was taken from a single camera point and was similar to a 1 point Architectural perspective done with some fast forwarding and an array of shots combined during editing.

A murdered young girl seeking vengeance from beyond the grave and performed killings of anonymous people until her body was discovered and the truth revealed. A copy of the video must be made by each viewer to avoid death from her vengeful spirit.

Abas Kamal bin Sulaiman is a movie enthusiast minus the ability to produce, act & the desire buy every new release movie DVD. He writes on a variety of movie based topics. Visit abassterinternational.blogspot.com abassterinternational.blogspot.com abassterinternational.blogspot.com

Walter Cronkite’s UFO Encounter

Friday, March 31st, 2006

He is the newsperson and anchor who reported some of the most exciting and traumatic events of the twentieth century to a huge television audience. From the assassination of President Kennedy, to the first men to walk on the Moon, Walter Cronkite brought us the news of those events over network television. He may also have been the first reporter to witness the biggest news story of modern history. It’s a story that remains untold.

As CBS Evening News Anchor for many years, Walter Cronkite was the friendly face on television that brought the good, bad or even tragic news of the day into the homes of millions of Americans. Because he did this before cable channels became such a big part of America‘s television viewing habits, he was more than just a reporter, newsperson or talking head. Walter Cronkite became a trusted source of information and media icon.

Despite the fact that he electronically entered millions of American homes almost every night of the week for so many years, Cronkite was and is a very private person. Little is known about his personal life, but the fact that he managed to work in the highly competitive Network News business for so many years without being implicated in any scandals or mischief speaks volumes about his character.

During the early 1970s, nine of the top ten most watched television entertainment shows were on CBS. No one who knows television history would argue with the fact that CBS was a network television powerhouse during that time. That included their news division. In 1973, CBS News was seriously considering an investigative project about UFOs. Things were changing. People were growing weary of a steady diet of bad news thrown at them daily. The Vietnam War, antiwar protests, the Watergate scandal, terrorism and Middle Eastern conflicts were wearing viewers down. Any news organization that wanted to stay on top would have to offer people some alternatives.

Local news broadcasts, daytime television talk shows and late night radio programs had already experienced some success covering paranormal issues, events and stories. By the early 1970s, New Age topics had reached a high point in popularity that had been building for some time. Among subjects like Ghosts, ESP, Psychic Powers, Reincarnation, Atlantis and Pyramid Power, UFOs were the clear winner when it came to overall public fascination. Stores were filled with books and magazines about UFOs, aliens and the government cover up of those things. As a result, CBS decided that the subject deserved serious consideration and made a decision to go ahead with their UFO project.

Like the subject itself, the CBS News UFO project was going to be something very different. They planned to look at the phenomenon from the standpoint of witnesses, authors and investigators with little or no editorial comment. It would be an investigative piece, but the investigating would be left up to those involved with the subject. It was an intriguing concept that would likely capture the imagination of viewers and leave the network safe from having to take a stand on the subject either way.

After months of viewing previous television news stories about UFOS and aliens, a decision had yet to be made about how the project should be presented. Should it be a one-time special program, series of short investigative pieces or regular feature to be shown in segments during network news broadcasts on slow news days? No one was sure. The only thing those involved with the CBS News UFO Project had agreed on was that Walter Cronkite should be approached to do the sit down interviews for the project. Once those were in the can, that material would be viewed and a final decision on the project format would be made.

I had already been investigating UFOs for several years by 1973, despite the fact that I was just seventeen years of age at the time. I was living in Florida with my parents and attending high school at the time. Because of unexpected public interest in a UFO Club I had organized as an after school project for extra credit, I was presenting a few short seminars each month about my investigations for local libraries and civic groups. Because of my youth, the success of the UFO Club and overall public fascination with the topic at that time, our local newspaper decided to interview me for an article about area UFO sightings and encounters. That article resulted in requests for me to appear on a few local radio and television shows and news broadcasts.

One of the local radio personalities who had me on his show had read a few of the short pieces I wrote for my school newspaper. He enjoyed them and suggested I submit the articles to publications that print stories about UFOs and related subjects. Having written professionally for a few trade publications himself, he gave me a thumbnail sketch of how to submit my material for possible publication. As a result, I went back and cleaned up the old articles, wrote a few new ones and started sending them out for consideration. I was surprised when a few ended up being published. This lead to my ultimate contact with Walter Cronkite.

As it happened, Cronkite read a small piece that I wrote for a now-defunct UFO publication. The topic of the article was the Air Force cover-up of UFO information and also included a few cases I had investigated. Cronkite was making a list of people he wanted to interview for the CBS project about UFOs and my article interested him. I never dreamed it would lead to a meeting with the legendary news anchor himself. I later wondered why? This was one of my first and most primitive attempts at writing and I was sure that he had read a thousand other articles by a thousand more qualified people.

In early September of 1973, I received a letter from CBS News indicating their interest in my work and desire to have me contact them about a television project they were planning. After a few phone calls, they offered to fly me to New York City to meet with Cronkite. As a transplanted New Yorker who had moved to Florida with my family a couple of years before, I was always glad to get back to the big city. I really liked Florida, but missed the pace and excitement of the Big Apple. I traveled there and stayed with relatives or friends whenever I could, so I was used to getting around the city by myself.

On a cool New York day in late September of 1973, I found myself back in the Big Apple and sitting down to an informal lunch with Walter Cronkite. For me, it just didn’t get better than that and it was hard to avoid being a bit overwhelmed by the experience. It wasn’t about being star-struck. Like most regular visitors to New York City, I was used to occasionally seeing celebrities out and about around town. I remember walking through the theater district in Manhattan early one morning during the mid-1970s. Richard Burton got out of a car five feet in front me. I stared he smiled, waved and quickly disappeared into the back door of a theater where he was appearing in Equus. Likewise, I recall meeting a number of important people through my father’s work as an Air Force Officer. I guess I was just in awe of this network news giant and more than a bit nervous.

I was surprised at how quickly the legendary reporter put me at ease. He had a gentle and laid-back manner that made me feel like we had known each other for years. I guess that was his gift and the thing that made Walter Cronkite such a successful news anchor. I appreciated the way he spoke with me as an equal, rather then treating me like some stupid kid. He seemed honestly interested in my UFO investigations and articles and appeared to genuinely respect my interest in the subject.

As we lunched, Cronkite told me what he knew about the CBS UFO Project and indicated that he wanted to interview me. He was honest in explaining that there was no way to tell how much or little of the interview would ultimately be used, if any. Regardless, he wanted a younger person’s perspective on the phenomenon for the project and liked the way I answered his questions up to that point. Most of the UFO researchers in those days were older and had taken up the topic as a Retirement project. Nevertheless, I also sensed there was more to this luncheon than he was letting on. He kept referring back to my articles on the government cover-up and asking about what I thought my father might have known about UFOs as an Air Force Officer. Then he dropped the bomb.

After about 30 minutes of talking, Cronkite said to me, “Let me tell you my UFO story.” For the next five minutes, I sat in stunned silence as he told me what had happened.

During the 1950s (I felt that he was being purposely vague about the exact date or year), Cronkite was part of a small pool of news reporters brought out to a tiny South Pacific island to watch the test of a new Air Force missile. After a short inspection of the new missile system by the reporters, they were lead to an area that was a safe distance from the launch site. The missile was mounted on a specially built launcher that was attached to a cement base. It was obvious that the area had been rapidly constructed just for this occasion. The details about the missile were going to be given to the reporters verbally now and in the form of handout sheets and press releases after the test.

Cronkite mentioned that he and the other reporters had been warned that photography of the missile test and any audio transmissions or recordings by the press was forbidden. They would have to give a written account of the event. Just as the test was ready to proceed, everyone was writing as fast as they could while an officer blurted out some prepared details about the new weapons system. As Air Force Security personnel walked around the perimeter of the test area with guard dogs and the news reporters watched, the missile was fired-up and about to be released. Just then, a large disc-type UFO appeared on the scene.

Without sharing any personal observations or feelings about the appearance of the object, Cronkite matter-of-factly stated that he guessed the object might have been about 50-60 feet in diameter, a dull gray color and had no distinguishing markings or visible means of propulsion. Because of the background noise generated by the missile engine and sudden flurry of activity, talking and shouting around him, he couldn’t tell whether the disc made any noise. He did not notice any coming directly from the object.

As Air Force Security personnel ran toward the UFO with their guard dogs, the disc hovered about 30 feet off the ground. It suddenly sent out a blue beam of light that struck the missile, a guard and a dog all at the same time. The missile had been frozen in mid-air about 70 feet from the launcher as it had taken off. One guard had been frozen in mid-step and a dog frozen in mid-air as it had jumped at the disc. Cronkite reminded me that this all happened within the space of about five minutes or less.

Suddenly, the missile exploded! After that, the disc vanished. The guard and dog looked all right, but were quickly taken away by medical personnel always present at tests in case anyone was injured. At the same time, Air Force Security personnel rapidly ushered the reporters into a nearby concrete observation bunker and control center. After about thirty minutes of sitting in that box, they were brought out into the air again and addressed by an Air Force Colonel.

The officer told them, “It was all part of the test.” Obviously making it up as he went along, the Colonel said that the event was “staged” to test media reaction to UFOs. He reinforced the usual line to the reporters that Flying Saucers were probably not extra-terrestrial, but what people were actually seeing were secret planes being tested by the Air Force. This test was designed to show the media how “shocking” it could be to suddenly view a new technology. Well, Cronkite was certain that what he viewed was a new technology, but he was also sure it was not an Earthly one! He didn’t believe the Air Force explanation then, and he still didn’t believe it at the time when he told me the story.

I was grateful for his brief comments about the incident, because he wasn’t the type of person that enjoyed sharing personal viewpoints. He continued…

After the event, reporters were told that since it was a test of media reaction to new technology, they could not report on it! However, they would be compensated later with exclusive stories on new Air Force projects (a promise that was probably never kept). The implication attached to that promise was that if anyone decided to report on the event it would be denied, could never be verified and would result in a blackout of information to any individual or news organization that took the risk of releasing the story in any way, shape or form.

I was sure that Cronkite felt safe in telling me about his experience. After all, I was just a kid interested in UFOs and who would listen to me? I was also sure it was his own personal revenge on the military for preventing him from releasing the story of the century. He knew I was likely to remain interested in the subject and would tell his story at some point in my life. And here I am doing that some thirty odd years later.

Being a very private person, Cronkite never did share with me his own beliefs about UFOs beyond the story he told me. Since he didn’t believe the object that appeared during the missile test was something the government cooked up and felt it wasn‘t something that looked like it had been made on earth, I guess I can assume he believed it was made elsewhere. But then, if I‘m going to think like Walter Cronkite, I am not going to assume anything about what he said. I’ll just let the story stand and allow you to take from it what you will just as he did when he told it to me.

I probably could have asked him a million questions after he told me the story, but I got the impression that our meeting was over and wasn’t about to challenge America’s most famous News Anchor. Instead, I was deep appreciative of his willingness to tell me a story that I was certain few, if any, other people outside of his family had probably heard.

Looking back on the whole experience, I now realize what a wonderful gift Walter Cronkite gave to me by sharing his UFO encounter story. Any story or anecdote told to me in person by Cronkite would have been a gift, but this was more than just a bit special. Besides my previous observations, I think he did it as a way of thanking me for sharing so much of the information I had about UFOs with him. I didn’t realize it at the time, but many of the stories and pieces of information I had collected from speaking with my father’s military pilot friends were anything but common knowledge in the UFO investigative field. That would explain his many questions and interest in what I knew about the government cover-up.

The CBS UFO Project turned into a less than memorable Special that was filmed shortly after my meeting with Cronkite. I was included in it for just a few minutes. During the filming, I became aware that Cronkite had not shared his story with any of the other UFO investigators or witnesses. I gleaned that from the fact that none of them discussed it among themselves, with me or even mentioned it in passing. After the special aired, I called one of Cronkite’s staff members and asked him if he had ever heard the UFO story. He told me he had, but I am not sure about that. I think he was probably an over-worked intern just trying to get me off the phone and didn’t have a clue what I was talking about. He said Cronkite had only shared the story with a few key people, but I think he was referring to something I had told him rather than visa versa. Either way, Cronkite’s Encounter story was certainly not covered or even mentioned in the Special. Nor anywhere else that I am aware of after all these years.

There was one last opportunity to find out if Cronkite had shared the story with any of his staff members. Just before leaving New York, there was a final meeting with each one of us who had been filmed for the CBS project. It was just a brief question and answer session to collect any missing background information about us or ask a few final questions off camera for screen quotes. I carefully hinted around at what Cronkite had told me, but none of the staffers asking the questions seemed to have a clue what I was talking about.

I was glad I had heard the story from Cronkite as a teen. I didn’t get a chance to speak with him at any length before, during or after the filming apart from the interview itself, but I did get to hear some of the other interviews he conducted from a short distance. I was amazed at how full of themselves some of the other UFO investigators sounded. Cronkite simply let them drone on. Most of those interviews were several edited later. I wondered if that would be me years from that time? I hope it’s not. I have tried very hard to apply the other thing I learned from my conversation with Walter Cronkite that day. Knowing the value of when to talk and when to listen.

Author: Bill Knell
Author’s Email: mailto:billknell@cox.net billknell@cox.net
Author’s Website: billknell.com billknell.com
Terms To Use Article: Permission is granted to use this article for free online or in print. Please add a link to or print my website address: billknell.com billknell.com

Learn Guitar - The Very Basics

Thursday, March 30th, 2006

Nobody likes to talk about the basics when starting to learn guitar. But they are important, and for a good reason. It is much easier to play the guitar if your technique is correct and efficient. The following guidelines will make it so much easier to learn the guitar without the difficulties associated with poor technique.

When you hold your guitar, place the body on your right leg, and the neck in your left hand. You should hold the pick in your right hand, between your thumb and your index finger only. 9 out of 10 of my new students have a tendency to want to hold their pick with both their index and middle fingers opposing the thumb. It usually takes me weeks to break that habit, so don’t start now!

In addition, be careful not to be chasing the neck of your guitar. Try to hold it so that the headstock is about at chest level. Hold the guitar close against your body and keep it under your control at all times.

If you haven’t already noticed, there are six strings on your guitar. The one closest to you, it should also be the thickest, is number 6. It is also the lowest string in terms of pitch on the guitar, so we also call it the low, or bottom string. The first string is also the top string and is the skinniest one on your guitar. If you have a classical guitar, it may not actually be the skinniest, but it should be the highest in pitch unless your guitar is really out of tune. The art and science of tuning is a whole other animal.

Now, let’s take the pick and pluck the first string. That’s called playing the string “open.” Now pluck the second string open, then the third string open. You’ve just played your first 3 notes on the guitar! I know, it doesn’t sound like much yet, but we have to start somewhere.

Your fingers are numbered 1 through 4, with your index finger being number 1, your middle finger being number 2, your ring finger is 3, and your pinky is 4. Now that you know how to play the first string open, let’s push down on the string with your first finger right behind the first fret. If you don’t remember, the frets are the small metal rails that go across the neck. There should be anywhere from 18 – 22 of them depending on the length of your guitar. Pluck the first string with the pick to make it sound.

The trick here is to push as close to the fret as possible without being on top of it. If you are on top of the fret, the note may sound muffled. If you’re too far away, or don’t push down hard enough, you’ll hear a buzzing sound instead of a nice, clear note.

Now try pushing down on the first string at the second fret and pluck the first string. Finally, push with your third finger on the third fret, and pluck the first string. When you push down on the second or third fret, it doesn’t matter whether or not you’re still pushing on either the first or second fret. Whatever fret is closest to the soundhole or pickups is the one that you’re going to hear.

Try pushing down on one of the first four frets on various strings to hear what they sound like and get the feel for how hard you have to push. You might be surprised at how easy it is. Remember that you always use your first finger for notes on the first fret, second finger for notes on the second fret, third finger for notes on the third fret, and your pinky will eventually get used for the fourth fret notes. It might be tough right now, but you’ll get stronger.

Always remember these basic techniques as you learn more about how to play the guitar. These are things that even seasoned professionals have to remind themselves of periodically, and things that can turn an arduous task into one of enjoyment and fun.

griffhamlin.com Griff Hamlin is a professional guitarist and teacher with 20 years of teaching, touring, and recording experience. For more guitar lessons, articles, and reviews, please visit griffhamlin.com GriffHamlin.com. There is a griffhamlin.com/modules/mydownloads/visit.php?cid=1&lid=1
Free Beginner’s Ebook to download.

Popular Tattoos For Men & Women

Thursday, March 30th, 2006

When you walk into a tattoo parlor, you are instantly greeted with eye-catching designs filled with color and complexity. Unless you have already decided on a design, it can be very difficult to select one on the spot. Even if you have a selected design already in mind, the artist may present you with varying possibilities that will present you with a difficult decision.

Before arriving for your tattoo, it is a good idea to have a selection of designs that you are interested in. Men and women will naturally select different images whereas the gentleman may prefer a masculine and powerful tattoo and the woman may prefer something dainty and pretty. For example, a gentleman may prefer a large tattoo with a lot of color or something that symbolizes the love that he shares for his wife or girlfriend. It is advisable that tattoo recipients give careful consideration to personalized tattoos. Why? If the relationship ends later, the tattoo will still remain unless it is surgically removed. Therefore, many gentlemen are electing to have symbols that remind them of something that they enjoy, such as a career, a hobby or a symbol that means something special to their life.

Women who decide to have a permanent tattoo will often select a dainty image, such as a heart, butterfly or floral depiction. These are small and can be placed anywhere, but most commonly are located on the hip, ankle or back of the shoulder area. Women typically select a smaller tattoo in an effort to make a statement of beauty and yet something that draws attention to a certain area, such as the leg or hip.

Even with these thoughts in mind, a tattoo is a very personal thing and must be a reflection of something that is important to the recipient. Therefore, there really isn’t a universal ‘man’ or ‘woman’ tattoo. Upon discussing various choices with the artist, a tattoo recipient will gain a better understanding of options and design choices. In addition, they will be able to browse through an image book or folder that will show a number of different tattoo choices, which will enable them to better decide which is right for them.

This article is to be used for informational purposes only. The information contained herein is not intended to be used in place of, or in conjunction with, professional medical advice or recommendations for tattoo placement. Before deciding on getting a tattoo or having one removed, the patient must consult a licensed medical doctor for medical advice and/or to determine the best course of action for his/her individual healthcare needs.

Join tattootype.com/ Tattoo Type community to share your opinion on the tattootype.com/forum/ tattoo forum or read what are the today tattoos on todaytattoos.com/ todaytattoos.com.

Download Internet Movie Online

Thursday, March 30th, 2006

Nowadays with broadband connection speed available to everyone, it is easy to download internet movie online. It is a convenient and fast way for busy people to download and watch movies in the comfort of their homes. It saves the need to step out of the house to rent or buy a DVD movie.

There are a couple of methods to download internet movie online.

The first method is by using P2P networks. P2P networks make use of peer to peer technology to distribute large data files. The problem with P2P networks is most of the movies are illegal or bootleg copies. By downloading these illegal movies, you are violating copyright and piracy laws and I highly advise you do not use this method to download internet movie online.

Also, spyware and viruses are rampant on P2P networks and it is unsafe to download such files on your computer.

The second method is make a one time purchase from online movies sites such as cinemanow or movielink. Typically you pay anywhere from 9.99 to 29.99 to download each movie.

The download file is usually in windows media format and is designed to play on your computer only.

The third method is to the services of download movie sites. These download movie sites usually charge a one time membership fee after which you are allowed to download unlimited internet movies. It is cheaper and more cost effective in the long run if you plan on purchasing download movies often.

The movies files are also much safer since they have been certified to be free from spyware and viruses. Download speeds are also much faster compared to ̢P networks. You can also get support if you encounter any problem unlike ̢P networks where there is no support.

I would highly recommend anyone who wants to download internet movie online to try download movie sites since it is cheap, fast and easy.

Ricky Lim is a avid movie fanatic. Discover the epromote.info/1/moviedownload.htm top internet movie download sites recommended by Ricky. epromote.info/1/moviedownload.htm Click here to find out.

Event Ticket Buying Tips

Thursday, March 30th, 2006

Have you ever had a bad ticket experience when purchasing events to a show? Whether it’s through primary sources such as ticketmaster, or secondary sources that compromise various ticket brokers and street sellers, problems can arise. So here are a few tips to help ease the pain and frustration.


Since ticketmaster is the original source for most events, problems are minimal. When purchasing tickets through ticketmaster make sure that you have your credit card, and all of it’s billing address info ready. Ticketmaster is simple to use but because it runs on timers, you can sometimes lose your tickets if too much time is taken entering information! This is very important especially when the event has just gone onsale and 1 million other fans are trying to buy the same event.


When buying through ticketbrokers, the buying experience can be a little more trivial, but with companies like ticketamerica.com worries can be virtually eliminated. Here is a list of things to look for when purchasing through ticketbrokers:


Make sure that the company has been in business for at least 2 years.

Make sure that they are a member in goodstanding with the Better Business Bureau or the National Association of Ticketbrokers.

Make sure they have a physical office with an 800# where a live agent can be reached.

See what ticket guarantees they offer to insure your ticket purchase.

When buying from street sellers, be careful!!! Most street sellers are simply trying to hustle a fast buck. They basically try to buy low from people with extra tickets and then resell them at a profit. They may also be ticket brokers that are selling any extra tickets that did not previously sell. Worst of all there are the theives. These little rats are basically selling fake tickets to unsuspecting fans! Here are a couple of tips when buying tickets on the street:


Look at the tickets front and back, making sure their is print on both sides.

Make sure that there is some slight sheen appearence and feel to the tickets.

Check to make sure that all the info on the ticket is correct, such as Date, Time, and consecutive seat #’s.

Have the ticket seller walk with you to the gate entrace and verify ticket authenticity.

If you have any questions regarding a ticket purchase or need an opinion about buying tickets, feel free to contact our office.


Gary Ketchum

CEO TicketAmerica.com

Gary Ketchum is the CEO of TicketAmerica since 1999. His company has provided hundreds of thousands of satisfied customers with event tickets, worldwide, @ ticketamerica.com ticketamerica.com Discover more about helpful ticket advice @ ticketamericablog.com ticketamericablog.com

Power Up Your Camera

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006

Your camera is heavily reliant on battery power. Your shots will depend on such power to take shots, view them on the LCD screen (if you have one) and transfer them to the memory card and thereafter to the computer. The use of flash, the optical zoom or working in extremes of weather will use up even more precious battery resources. Constant reviewing of yor images after you take them represents a further strain.

It is imperative that you keep your batteries in good shape. Here’s how:


- charge batteries well before use

keep your batteries fresh


- reduce the brightness on the LCD screen

conserves unnecessary power drain


- reduce your use of the flash - shoot in bright conditions or use a high ISO

flash is rarely needed


- check you camera for “power saving” features

your camera can help reduce wastage


- keep batteries warm by storing them near to your body

cold conditions and batteries don’t mix


- don’t keep fiddling with the camera

reviewing images and zooming uses power


- keep a spare battery!

a good investment and available on auction sites


- use NiMH

produce good power with the least loss

You can be sure that your best image taking opportunites will be at a time when your camera is low on battery power. Don’t get caught out!

Eric Hartwell is an enthusiastic photographer. He owns and runs the photography resource site theshutter.co.uk theshutter.co.uk and the associated discussion forums theshutter.co.uk/forums theshutter.co.uk/forums as well as the regular weblog at thephotographysite.blogspot.com thephotographysite.blogspot.com Anyone interested in getting involved contact him at mailto:shutter@theshutter.co.uk shutter@theshutter.co.uk

Fed Up With FM - Podcasting

Wednesday, March 29th, 2006

If you are fed up with listening to your local FM station and the mass of inane adverts that punctuate each show, or, if you crave interesting spoken word programmes that are written and presented by excited, knowledgeable enthusiasts, then Adam Curry’s “Daily Source Code” podcast may just be just what your a looking for.

Adam is one of a rapidly increasing group known as “podcasters”, whose shows are created to be heard on iPods or other MP3 players. Formerly an MTV video-jock, he is the man who created the “iPodder” program. Downloadable from www.iPodder.org, this easy to use software allows you to decide which audio feed you wish to subscribe to. This is then automatically added to your iPod or MP3 player to listen to when you decide.

The great thing about Podcasting is that it allows listeners to download their favorite shows automatically. There are now tons of “advertisement-free” radio channels for listeners to subscribe to, with more emerging every day.

Once set-up with a program like iPodder your favorite program downloads automatically whilst you sleep, so that you can listen to it on the journey into work the next day, or whenever it suits you. You are not tied to any schedule. It is true “radio-on-demand”.
When you visit ipodder.org you will see details of the latest podcasts and you will be able to easily subscribe to shows such as “Coverville”, a music show consisting purely of really interesting cover versions as well as the truly original, if not a little whacky, “Whole Wheat Radio” from Talkeetna, Alaska. (Where!!).

There are, of course, lots of shows created and presented by true Podcast enthusiasts and knowledgable techies, such as “The Engadget Podcast” and “IT Conversations″. However, by mixing all of these topic areas you can end up with a true, custom-made radio experience that meets all of your listening requirements.

Podcasting is still in it’s’ infancy and over the next 12 months you will see more and more growth in this unique field. Podcasting is a real example of a technology that simply could not have existed even 2 years ago and with just a little effort on your part over the coming months you could play a significant part in the development of this exciting and creative medium.

Colin Maddocks is a web-based travel agent and marketer running several, successful web businesses, including rss-feeds-4u.com rss-feeds-4u.com and ipod-accessories-4u.com ipod-accessories-4u.com amongst others. He is particularly excited by new web developments in RSS Feeds and Podcasting. Colin has written articles on web selling and new technology.